Equal Justice Works Fellow and PISLAPer Ross Brockway shares, through the poignant story of Timothy, how child support law is disproportionately punitive in the US saying that "in nearly every possible way, the law sought to make things worse rather than better for Timothy’s family". The Georgia Justice Project helps people like Timothy deal with this by, amongst other things, forming "deep relationships with our clients and their families, such that we become lifelong friends and partners, rather than simply lawyers and clients." Artist and justice advocate, Kim Vanderheiden has created, with Timothy's permission, a beautiful family portrait deepening our ability through image to appreciate the tender humanity of someone that can become unfairly burdened by the law.
This year, inspired in part by Ross's story of Timothy and the work of GJP, PISLAP submitted a policy proposal to the 2020 Democratic Party Platform Committee pushing for radical changes to US Child Support Laws. We publish the proposal in full in this issue.
Other wonderful contributions from different parts of the world include a call for an exciting new field of legal practice called Positive Green Criminology from Femke Wijdekop in The Netherlands; a spacious invitation and enquiry about connecting with our deep feelings of care for nature from Barry Lee in Ireland; advocating for the broader responsibility of business towards our collective wellbeing from John Montgomery in the US; a rich dive into the work of Earth Jurisprudence in Africa from Carlotta Byrne of the UK Gaia Foundation; an aspirational prayer for law to be recognised and practised as the vocation of service it really is from Jenipher Jones in the US; and truly inspiring news of an ongoing project in The Netherlands to reimagine the design of the courtroom from Wikke Monster.
Supporting and infusing all of these are brilliant images. Special mention goes to UK barrister Dave Neitawho has shared a selection of his thought-provoking 'lockdown cartoons'.
Many of us advocating for a more conscious approach to law are familiar with the oft-disillusioning feeling of being the dissenter, the minority view. RBG also said “Dissents speak to a future age. It’s not simply to say, ‘My colleagues are wrong and I would do it this way.’ But the greatest dissents do become court opinions and gradually over time their views become the dominant view. So that’s the dissenter’s hope: that they are writing not for today, but for tomorrow.” It can help to imagine that maybe we are occupying the important role of advocating "not for today, but for tomorrow." Something to continue to give us succour for the journey ahead.